LOGIPUNDIT
Google
 
Web logipundit.blogdrive.com

Logipundit.com is...

A bastion of reason, free of rhetoric and partisan talking points, and full of diverse and fact-based, historically-sound views.

The Logipundit is a conservative, and makes no apologies for it, however the other authors offer an array of views. All of us will do our best NOT to be "fair and balanced" but instead intellectually honest and civil.

   

<< August 2006 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05
06 07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31


AUTHORS


DCOffline
John Broussard
Jordan
Logipundit
Reagan Gahagan
Rothell
Scottie


LINKS

News Links

Memri

Other Blogs

Backspin
BlameBush
Beyond Rhetoric
Daily Kos
DC Offline
Discriminations
Expertise
Guardian Watchblog
Instapundit
New England Republican
Polipundit
Slate
Spinsanity
Tapped
Terrorism Unveiled


RECOMMENDED BOOK AND LINK LISTS

DCOffline:
Confessions of an Economic Hitman, by John Perkins

Jordan:

Johnny B:

Race and Culture, by Thomas Sowell

The Road to Serfdom, by F.A. Hayek

Autobiography of Calvin Coolidge, by Calvin Coolidge

Logipundit:

The End of Racism, by Dinesh D'Souza

John Adams, by David McCullough

Reagan Gahagan:

Rothell:

Scottie:
Understanding Power, by Noam Chomsky



If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



 
Thursday, August 24, 2006
Short Interview with Michael Scheuer (author of Imperial Hubris)

Full disclosure: I haven't yet read the book.

This article provides Scheuer's perspective on the current state of affairs with regards to Al-Qaeda, Afghanistan, Iraq and Israel/Hezbollah.

 


Posted at 10:49 pm by Ripster

Emily
August 25, 2006   01:06 AM PDT
 
Wait a minute...Ripster, are you Ken Silverstein?
Emily
August 25, 2006   01:22 AM PDT
 
Cool article...So what is your perspective? The intervewee states that we are losing b/c of:
1. Our perceived image in the middle east.
2. Our physical presence in the middle east
3. Our policies

With the media today, I don't think we have a chance with improving anyone's perception.

I think we're in a catch 22, expecially with reason #2. If we get the f-out, then it's more of a reason for terror attaks and we abandon any folks there who want us there. If we stay, we provoke attacks.

Our policies are tied to our economy and guess what that is tied to?

I'm buying stock in bicycles. Schwinn anyone?
Ripster
August 25, 2006   10:26 PM PDT
 
I think his theme is that the opinion of those that hate us is primiarily driven by our actions (#2 and #3, respectively) and that our actions are currently provoking more hate. I didn't notice anything much in the article regarding your first point. Also, I disagree that us getting out is, in and of itself, a REASON for more terror attacks. I think the opposite is true - us not being on their soil is one less selling point they have to future recruits. I can see your point about abandoning those that depend on us for security; but, if you feed the birds in the park for too long and stop, they starve. I think we should leave Iraq in the near-term. If we leave, I don't believe any Jefferson's or Paine's will spring up from the rubble, or that it won't be quite ugly for a while. But, I believe us leaving will result in three autonomous regions (with the fighting being over border areas and, of course, oil) that will have varying degrees of freedom. Not perfect, but keeping 100K troops in Iraq isn't perfect either.

Also, as you said, our economy drives our policy. The sad reality is that it takes bigger thinking than our politically expedient establishment is capable of to fix the gushing crutch of our economy. Our only hope is that the private sector can eventually kill that crutch and make us truly free!
Johnny
August 27, 2006   10:11 AM PDT
 
Interesting commentary Ripster, a much needed boost of libertarianism.
 

Leave a Comment:

Name


Homepage (optional)


Comments




Previous Entry Home Next Entry